Electrolytic Instead Of Ceramic

The ones shown the photo appear to be the mlcc type.

Electrolytic instead of ceramic.

The polarization may mean it cannot be used in this application. You know when you re using electrolytics they re polarized and the values are larger. There are various types of ceramic caps. They re almost all ceramic save the 33pf off 8 which looks like it might be a mylar or tantalum though honestly ceramic should be fine there too.

0 47µf is small for a electrolytic and is a polarized cap. It also has more leakage than a ceramic and poorer performance at high frequencies. Voltage characteristics must be taken into account. Make sure you use one with a high enough voltage rating.

When using ceramics in power rail applications their capacitance vs. It would be better to use ceramic and also for the 10uf and 1uf cap as well. And i was wondering if i could use 1uf electrolytic capacitors instead of the 1uf tantalum capacitors and the 1uf ceramic capacitors on this circuit since i couldn t find any tantalum or ceramic anywhere in my country. Sounds like you are reading the value of the ceramic capacitor incorrectly.

Without seeing the circuit it s not really feasable to advise you what you could replace the ceramic capcitor with although you seemed to have proven that the electrolytic you have is not the answer and at very least the incorrect value. Electrolytic and ceramic caps have different characteristics and one may or may not work well in place of the other. Mlcc caps are made in a surface mount package most commonly though they can be found in leaded packages as shown in the photo. If you can get ceramic caps even several parts in parallel do that instead of electrolytics.

0 47µf is large for a ceramic and is a non polarized high quality cap.